Peer Review Process

Information for Author

Manuscripts submitted to this journal will be reviewed by editorial board in accordance with focus and scope, template, and author guidelines of this journal. The submitted manuscripts must address scientific merit or novelty appropriate to the focus and scope. Editors check the plagiarism detection of articles in this journal by using a Turnitin software. 

Manuscript declared eligible by the editor will be either returned to the author for improvement or directly sent to the reviewer in blind review. Peer-reviewed will be done at least by 2 (two) or more expert reviewers. It usually takes one - two weeks for each reviewer to review. Final decision of articles acceptance will be made by Editors according to reviewers comments.

 

Review Decision

Before reviewer accept or decline an invitation to review, please note the following questions.

  • Is the article requested to be reviewed in accordance with your expertise? If you receive a manuscript that covers the topics that are not appropriate areas of your expertise, please notify the editor or recommend an alternative reviewer.
  • Do you have the time to review this paper? The review process must be completed within two weeks. If you agree and require a longer period, notify the editor or suggest an alternative reviewer.
  • Is there any potential conflict of interest? Meanwhile, conflicts of interest will not disqualify you as a reviewer, disclose all conflicts of interest to the editor before reviewing. 

 

Review Evaluation

Your review result will help the editor to decide whether or not to publish the articles in our journal. The peer reviewer is responsible for critiquing by reading and evaluating manuscripts in the field of expertise, then giving constructive advice and honest feedback to the author of the article submitted. Peer reviewers, discuss the strengths and weaknesses of the article, how to increase the strength and quality of the paper, and evaluate the relevance and authenticity of the manuscript. You may find the full template for reviewer guidelines here